On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Walter Bright<[email protected]> wrote: > Bill Baxter wrote: >> >> If it's internal to the parse tree can't you make the syntax whatever you >> want? >> Something like (expr1 __exprSequencer expr2) should do just fine, right? >> No reason it has to be a precious one-character symbol syntax. > > What if you're writing a program that generates D code?
..then you'd have it generate multiple statements? Really, I'm not seeing the justification here!
