On 2013-11-10 18:45:14 +0000, bearophile said:
It avoids code like this, that needs an auxiliary variable:aux = foo(n); if (n == aux && aux == bar(n) && ...Is this idea going to cause troubles with operator overloading or something else? Do you like it? Is it important enough?Bye, bearophile
if( n == (foo(n) == bar(n))) is legal.
