On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Walter Bright<newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote: > Jarrett Billingsley wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Unknown W. >> Brackets<unkn...@simplemachines.org> wrote: >>> >>> I have not read this entire topic, but what about the following: >>> >>> case 5, .., 9: >> >> I don't have a problem with the current syntax, but the mathematical >> side of my brain squealed with fanboyish glee when it saw this. This >> would be FANTASTIC. > > At some point, we need to just move on with this. As to ,.., I suggest is it > not visually very distinct in many fonts (the comma and the .) and may lead > to frustrating syntax errors. > > While there are many "programmers' fonts" that do a good job making the > characters all distinguishable, the language shouldn't rely too heavily on > that. There's already enough trouble with 0 and O.
int O_O = 0_0;
