On 2013-11-14 09:39, luka8088 wrote:
Just a wild thought...Maybe we can have monthly release and still keep it stable. Imagine this kind of release schedule: Month # 11 12 1 2 3 2.064 2.065 2.066 2.067 2.068 2.065rc2 2.066rc2 2.067rc2 2.068rc2 2.069rc2 2.066rc1 2.067rc1 2.068rc1 2.069rc1 2.070rc1 2.067b2 2.068b2 2.069b2 2.070b2 2.071b2 2.068b1 2.069b1 2.070b1 2.071b1 2.072b1 2.069alpha 2.070alpha 2.071alpha 2.072alpha 2.073alpha Where new features are only added to alpha release. And bug fixes are added to all releases. This way new bug fixes and new features would be released every month but there would be a 5 month delay between the time that feature A is added to the alpha release and the time feature A is propagated to the stable release. But during this period feature A would be propagated through releases and there would be plenty of opportunity to test it and clear it of bugs. I am not a fan of such delay but I don't see any other way new features could be added without higher risk of bugs. Also vote up for daily snapshots.
Are you saying we should have six releases going on at the same time? -- /Jacob Carlborg
