On 14 November 2013 20:51, Walter Bright <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/13/2013 4:38 PM, Manu wrote: > >> How about the rvalue-temp -> ref thing? That's getting REALLY tired. >> > > I know, I know :-( > So, 2.065 then :P
On 14 November 2013 20:51, Walter Bright <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/13/2013 4:38 PM, Manu wrote: > >> How about the rvalue-temp -> ref thing? That's getting REALLY tired. >> > > I know, I know :-( > So, 2.065 then :P