On Monday, 18 November 2013 at 05:05:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/17/2013 7:14 PM, deadalnix wrote:
As I understand it, Timon choosed that syntax simply to
demonstrate the
limitation of your proposal using a similar syntax. Not to
propose a syntax.
Ok, then I'm not seeing what AST macros do that lazy parameters
/ template overloading / mixin templates do not?
2 things. First, they can act on statement or declaration. Simply
not with the proposed syntax. Second they can reflect what is
passed as argument and act accordingly, when the lazy expression
solution cannot.
