On 11/18/13 2:49 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/18/2013 2:37 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/18/13 1:50 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
I believe this is solving the problem in the wrong place. The function
being called should not be throwing, and should be defined as not
throwing. See my other posts in this thread on the topic.
I think a stance of unceremoniously halting the program upon passing
the wrong
parameters to a standard library function is a bit excessive.
Dang, I gotta argue this with you too? :-)
Yes. I agree with your fundamental point but it is missing important
nuances. I destroyed the misunderstanding in http://goo.gl/3xD5Aj.
Andrei
