On Friday, 22 November 2013 at 02:35:40 UTC, Shammah Chancellor wrote:

...

What!?  That shouldn't even be legal code!   See below for why:

...

Maybe that's why it is considered broken? The first point was to 'fix' scope(failure) and then use it.

However, I don't know I haven't been following the discussion closely enough...

Reply via email to