On Tuesday, 19 November 2013 at 07:10:32 UTC, Robert wrote:
I changed the string mixin now to take an enum instead of the
string for specifying the protection. You convinced me, it is
just nicer.
https://vhios.dyndns.org/dlang.org/web/phobos/std_signal.html
https://github.com/phobos-x/phobosx/blob/master/source/phobosx/signal.d
I will also look into improving documentation a bit soon.
Best regards,
Robert
Robert, it will be great to see some more documentation for
`std.signal`.
For example, you can:
- add more usage examples for each public function
- add tread-safe example for multi-tread application
- add better signal description and add more external links
(for examle, to the wikipedia -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signals_and_slots). Look at the
old std.signals - http://dlang.org/phobos/std_signals.html
Thanks!
Looks there are no real objections against the proposal but I am
rather concerned about general lack of activity during review. As
a compromise, what about putting it in "candidate" category
(http://code.dlang.org/?sort=updated&category=library.std_aspirant)
and making 1-2 month pause before proceeding to actual voting?
That will also fix minor issue of me being a bit busy and not
paying proper attention :)
