Am Mon, 25 Nov 2013 09:46:14 -0800 schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org>:
> On 11/24/13 11:43 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: > > Library maintainers need to stop writing code with the assumption > > that their code is only going to be used with dmd and x86, and they > > should have stopped doing it 6 months ago. > > I agree, but the real solution to that would be unittests that fail. > > Andrei > > Or static asserts. It looks like some people just don't know that the D real type is platform specific. A simple static if (real.mant_dig == 64) else static assert(false); Already helps a lot. If the code instead just assumes x86 real layout we usually only see memory corruption or bogus / invalid results and debugging that is not much fun.