On 11/26/13 3:40 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Again though, my position is that curl is ok and I use it myself, but let's not assume we need the entire kitchen sink that curl offers, especially given the fact that std.net.curl barely scratches it anyway. If someone does need one of curl's less common features, it is still there for them, but for the 99% we can do with the std.net.curl api, I'm sure we could make that happen in ~1000 lines of curl replacement.
Care to make it interesting? I may have some funds for this. But we're looking for no less than a glorious 100% replacement.
Andrei
