On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 16:24:34 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 at 11:37:45 UTC, Jonas Drewsen
wrote:
I definitely agree. In addition D has obtained some nice
features since the definition of the std.net.curl API that I
would liked have used back then.
What are you thinking of there? I think plain old classes and
delegates are a good fit for http stuff.
Indeed, the basic design for wrapping curl is not that bad I
think. One thing that was not available was UFCS which I think
could have made the API look a bit different.
Another thing that could have have affected the API is support
for named parameters which is still not supported (and probably
never will?).
/Jonas
