Lutger: > Isn't .C#'s Nullable<T> a library thing? (It's quite useful for database > crap)
C# nullable are nice because they have syntax support, so they are more handy than a purely library solution. But I was not talking about C# nullables :-) It's kind of the opposite, I was talking about non-nullable object references, have you read the link I have put in my answer to Andrei? http://delight.sourceforge.net/null.html Bye, bearophile
