On 12/4/2013 4:16 AM, Shammah Chancellor wrote:
With the version, is there any chance of LLVM being the default backend -- or is Walter opposed to that?
I'm opposed to it.For one example, a year ago I had to make dmd work on Win64. LLVM didn't support Win64. I would have been stymied.
It is very good for D to have 3 equivalent implementations - dmd, gdc, and ldc. Each has its strengths and weaknesses. It makes for a very strong ecosystem.
