On Saturday, 7 December 2013 at 17:43:46 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
On Saturday, 7 December 2013 at 17:29:43 UTC, bearophile wrote:
public Point Move(int dx, int dy) => new Point(X + dx, Y + dy);
That means:
public Point Move(int dx, int dy) { return new Point(X + dx, Y
+ dy); }
Maybe It's just me, but on the example above I don't see too
much improvement:
1 word off ("return"), and "=>" instead of brackets.
You've pretty much just summed up the argument not to introduce
lambda syntax. It has been proven wrong.
