BCS Wrote: > If I'm understanding the situation correctly, what you just > described is ONLY a problem on Windows and only because > of a design flaw in the way DLL's work.
That might be well be the case. But to basically then say that when developing with D on Windows it is highly recommended that DLL's are not used will just end up sounding like limitation of D and not of Windows DLLs. Windows developers know languages like C/C++, C#, Visual Basic, in fact almost any language you care to name, have no trouble working with DLLs so the question they will be asking is why should D?
