On Sunday, 15 December 2013 at 17:30:03 UTC, Orvid King wrote:
Your missing it's meaning when used on imports, which requires you to use the full module name to access it's members.
Good point - I guess it already is a whore keyword...
On the topic of static with, perhaps modifying with to accept a type as it's argument would be enough?
Care to elaborate? I don't see how `with(<type>)` can supply the original functionality of `with`, let alone solve the scope problem...
