On Wednesday, 18 December 2013 at 15:20:39 UTC, Kenji Hara wrote:
I think adding new keyword/attribute just for readability is
overkill.
Kenji Hara
We can use `unique` keyword as unique storage class of variables
in future if we decide that this feature can be useful.
It's not my idea, see `std.exception.assumeUnique`:
"Checking for uniqueness during compilation is possible in
certain cases (see the unique and lent keywords in the ArchJava
language), but complicates the language considerably.".
We already have reserved `macro` keyword for AST macros, so add
one more reserved keyword for possible language improvement is
not so terrible. But, of course, it's only my IMHO.
