"Francesco Cattoglio" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > On Thursday, 19 December 2013 at 11:42:34 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: >> I'd say it will be much more tempting to dabbel with it if it is in D. >> I'd even say it will be difficult not to! :) > > Couldn't agree more: I've been reading some sources of Phobos. > When compared to C++ standard library, it's a pleasure to read. > I wouldn't be bothering reading Phobos if it was such a mess. > > Of course ddmd will be pretty much translated C++, but I guess lots of > refactoring will be following shortly (for the compiler-as-library > project).
Lots and lots and lots and lots.
