On 20/12/13 01:41, deadalnix wrote:
If that is an extra learning cost, doesn't it make the semantic more complex, almost by definition ?
Compared to ... ?As far as I can see, it's learning a small extra meaning of 'const' in a context where it's quite intuitive, versus introducing an extra keyword which is used _only_ in this context and which is not entirely intuitive.
I'd have said the second would be more complex and more likely to lead to practical misunderstanding.
