On 21.12.2013 14:03, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-12-21 11:14, Russel Winder wrote:
Inline assembly language is a huge disadvantage in many (most?) case.
I don't know. Would you like to move all the current inline assembly in
druntime to their own files? I don't use assembly myself but it seems
convenient to have support for inline assembly for use cases like in
druntime. Most inline assembly in drunimte only consists of 1-10 lines
of code.
Personally I rather use powerful external macro assemblers like
NASM/MASM than inline assemblers, as I mentioned a few times here.
Specially since most inline assemblers I used tend to be rather limited
in comparison.
--
Paulo
