On 1/2/14, Cooler <[email protected]> wrote: > As I understand any type can be used instead of void, because > assert((bool[0]).sizeof == 0). Correct?
Yes, the only reason void was there was to make it more documenting.
On 1/2/14, Cooler <[email protected]> wrote: > As I understand any type can be used instead of void, because > assert((bool[0]).sizeof == 0). Correct?
Yes, the only reason void was there was to make it more documenting.