On 4 January 2014 03:31, logicchains <[email protected]> wrote: > On Saturday, 4 January 2014 at 03:16:37 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote: >> >> Basically D provides safety, but it also provides means to do unsafe >> things. I'm not familiar with Rust, but I wouldn't be surprised if unsafe >> actions could also be taken. > > > You can still take unsafe actions, they just need to be wrapped in an > 'unsafe' block. Any code that calls this block also needs to be marked as > 'unsafe'. I recently wrote the exact same program in both D and Rust, and if > you compare the two you'll find that almost the entire Rust program is > enclosed in 'unsafe' blocks (note the Rust code is for a release from a > couple of months ago, so the syntax is outdated).
Rust syntax changes every couple of months?!?!?
