On 2014-01-08 14:09, Mike Parker wrote:
I could have sworn I read somewhere in this thread that there was talk of including it in Phobos at some point. That's the perspective I've been arguing from. If it's fully intended to be separate from Phobos, then there's no need for any of this and the feature list could certainly be more specific.
In the first post it says something about inclusion in Phobos. I interpreted the post like that as well.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
