Am Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:42:14 +0100 schrieb Jacob Carlborg <[email protected]>:
> On 2014-01-10 01:57, Manu wrote: > > > I've heard that, and I think that's a lame argument. Would people rather > > break peoples code *who deliberately chose to use a beta feature, and > > accept the contract while doing so (that it would later be moved to > > 'std' proper)*, or consistently produce features that have very little > > proven foundation in practical application? It takes year(/s) before > > enough people can have had a crack at a new API in enough scenarios to > > reveal where it went right, and where it went wrong. > > I think it's a good idea, others don't. When do we have a meeting of the elders to decide on this matter? -- Marco
