On 10.01.2014 17:21, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Friday, 10 January 2014 at 11:43:05 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 15:37:11 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 00:37:27 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Thanks. Not many votes though given all the downvotes. The comments
manage to be even worse than on my first blog post.
For some reason they all assume I don't know C++ even though I know
it way better than D, not to mention that they nearly all miss the
point altogether. Sigh.
I wonder if someone who "knows" C++ is going to help you out and
improve your code, much like others did with the other languages you
used.
I know C++. It's not that I can't finish it, it's that I can't be
bothered to. That's the whole point of the post.
Atila
I know, that doesn't mean someone can't come in and fix what they see
wrong with it. C++ programmers have less reason to prove their language,
but I think most are in denial that their language is diffacult and that
it is a problem.
It does not help that C and C++ are currently the only portable
languages across mainstream OS vendors.
Currently I am using C++ for my Android hobby development, not because I
don't like Java, rather as it being the only common language across all
mobile SDKs.
--
Paulo
