Am 10.01.2014 22:24, schrieb John Colvin:
On Friday, 10 January 2014 at 21:12:21 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 10 January 2014 21:02, Dwhatever <[email protected]> wrote:
I see LLVM as a better choice because the license is less intrusive.
That is a rather ignorant assumption.
I've got some pretty strong sympathies with the gpl, but really? In most
practical circumstances gpl is on the more restrictive end of common
open-source licences.
Restrictive to whom?
One reason why my open source code is under GPL, is due to my
experience in projects in the enterprise world, where other more
"free" licenses are taken as free beer and as a mean of avoiding paying
licenses.
No contribution is ever done, in any form.
--
Paulo
