Am 12.01.2014 11:27, schrieb Rainer Schuetze:

I think a moving collector is currently not feasible without restricting
the language a lot, probably similar to safe D and more. I'm not sure we
want that in general.


Could you give an example which part of the language would not be doable with a moving collector? The only thing that comes to my mind is unions and that problem can be solved by allowing the user to specify manual scanning functions for structs or classes containing unions.

Also I don't think that we can create a GC which performs as good as the one of Java or C# if we are not willing to make the neccessary changes for a moving gc.


Reply via email to