07-Nov-2013 17:45, Dicebot пишет:
Time to move forward with some more reviews :)

Our current victim is std.signal by Robert Klotzner which is supposed to
deprecate and supersede existing (and broken) std.signals

[snip]
If there are any frequent Phobos contributors / core developers
please pay extra attention to submission code style and fitting
into overall Phobos guidelines and structure.

There was a concern about the lack of feedback. Here goes.
I'm not going to vote on this for the following reasons:

1. Never was fond of signal-slots as a pattern (Observer). I always find implementations to be overly complex for their own good. 2. When I needed something remotely like that I'll do just fine with array of delegates. 3. I never had no interest in old std.signal, I won't shed a tear if all kinds of std.signal would be removed from Phobos. 4. Even though I'd wanted to review the code itself I never found time to do it.


--
Dmitry Olshansky

Reply via email to