On 2013-12-28 22:07, Dicebot wrote:
I have deja vu - remember talking with you about exactly this topic in NG several months ago :)
Perhaps :)
(My point was that it will still work if we make built-in attributes qualified with a reserved module name which is backwards-compatible change)
And my answer to that was probably something like: that module name could already be in use today. Also, then we get a third way of naming keywords:
@property nothrow @reserved.foobar int bar (); -- /Jacob Carlborg
