On Thursday, 23 January 2014 at 08:12:08 UTC, OP wrote:
I'd like Walter to reply to this. In his article here http://www.drdobbs.com/architecture-and-design/so-you-want-to-write-your-own-language/240165488

Walter says

Somewhat more controversial, I wouldn't bother wasting time with lexer or parser generators and other so-called "compiler compilers." They're a waste of time. Writing a lexer and parser is a tiny percentage of the job of writing a compiler. Using a generator will take up about as much time as writing one by hand, and it will marry you to the generator (which matters when porting the compiler to a new platform). And generators also have the unfortunate reputation of emitting lousy error messages.

Using bison I can write complex statements which are easy for me to grok and change. I wouldn't know how to change complex statements if I hand wrote the parser. I don't know all the places something like that would affect. Taking the syntax below I'm not sure how to fork a state and discard the invalid one.

foo[5] = var2
foo[5] foo = var2

Here when I see foo[5] I'm either accessing an array (first statement) or declaring variables as an array of 5 elements (second statement). Just like `Foo&foo` could be a reference or could be an AND statement. Foo is definitely processed on its own, I don't know how to process it as both (a fork) and continue on the parser to find a valid path.

A simple solution to this problem would be to try and parse the longer statement first. If that doesn't work, then go for the shorter one. In your first case you have two possible declarations:

 - the 'variable definition': [Type] [Name] ('=' [R-Expression])?
 - the 'value assignment'. [L-Expression] '=' [R-Expression]

When you can't parse a variable definition, try the value definition.


I found that writing a parser in general is not that hard. The difficult part is figuring out what the syntax and the AST should look like. I recommend just trying to create something for a limited set of your language and work your way up from there.

Reply via email to