Sean Kelly wrote: > Compiler writers are free to add features so long as they're compatible > with > the base language--just look at Microsoft's C++ compiler. What makes a D > compiler a D compiler is that it conforms to the D language spec.
That's not exactly true, now is it? There is no D spec. A D compiler is a D compiler if: * it is DMD, or * it translates D code the same way as DMD. -- Michiel Helvensteijn
