On 24 January 2014 21:49, Regan Heath <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:21:12 -0000, Jacob Carlborg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I would expect "contains" to take a element and check if it exists in the
>> range.
>>
>
> Except in the case of string, where we also want an overload taking more
> than a single element aka a substring.


A great example of when the string function should not be conflated with
the general function.

Reply via email to