Am 31.01.2014 15:27, schrieb Jonathan Bettencourt:
Is it just me or does the implementation of atomic.d look grossly inefficient and badly in need of a rewrite?
I can't really judge that, as I don't have much experience in lock free programming. But if someone is to rewrite this module, then it should be someone with quite some experience in lock free programming. Taking a look at the memory model of C++11 and copy from there, might not hurt either.
