On 2/5/14, 9:40 AM, Manu wrote:
On 6 February 2014 02:16, Dicebot <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:On Wednesday, 5 February 2014 at 16:13:33 UTC, Manu wrote: Huh? Why would they? They don't create cycles, and would clean up reliably. Because they still return T* and not RC!T ? Andrei's post speaks purely about extra library type and does not mention about possibility to make it default allocation type for language. Or it is just silently assumed? Dunno, but I don't think any solution which uses RC!T will ever be acceptable.
Why not? What would be deemed acceptable? And who's the acceptor?
It basically defeats the whole purpose.
What is the purpose? Andrei
