On 2/6/14, 9:35 AM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
The documentation states:"The two ranges are assumed to be sorted by less." Would it make more sense for this function, and its siblings, to take a SortedRange instead. This would be a breaking change as it would require people to either sort or assumeSorted before calling. But SortedRange was added for exactly this application (I believe).
Yah, it's a historical order artifact. Andrei
