On 2/7/14, Dmitry Olshansky <[email protected]> wrote: > Much simpler - it returns a special dchar to designate bad encoding. And > there is one defined by Unicode spec.
A NaN for chars? Sounds great to me! :)
On 2/7/14, Dmitry Olshansky <[email protected]> wrote: > Much simpler - it returns a special dchar to designate bad encoding. And > there is one defined by Unicode spec.
A NaN for chars? Sounds great to me! :)