On Friday, 7 February 2014 at 22:55:05 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/07/2014 11:23 PM, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
Reserving `alias this = ...;` allows adding aliasing of
constructors in
the future, assuming it can be meaningfully defined.
What a mess that would be. If the consensus is that alias this
syntax was a mistake then _both_ forms should be removed and
the concept should be re-introduced as specially named member
instead.
Timon, this makes a lot of sense. Would you mind elaborating
with a simple syntax sample?
