On Monday, 10 February 2014 at 04:22:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Your thoughts are appreciated (all 6 of them in as many sentences). There is something to be said, however, about armchair quarterbacking and holier-than-thou kibitzing on what others should be doing. This community is as close as it gets to a meritocracy, so if you think you know what's good, you do good. If you want your stupendously many "I think"s to carry weight, follow them with some "I do"s as well. Hop on github. This endless walk through your knowledge base just isn't useful.

Good job, my initial response to Manu was a critique of going Ad Hominem and you as a person time and time again fail in that regard in many discussions. You do however deserve a round of ad hominem because you as one of the two people who are in a position to communicate the project vision and set forth MEASURABLE goals that can be tracked and evaluated, but you refuse to do so.

All talk of meritocracy is essentially hypocrisy because all projects need to establish boundaries and a goal post, and you fail miserably in that regard. That's why D is a slow mover. "This endless walk through [my] knowledgebase" is of course not a walk through my knowledgebase, it is an assessment of the project that YOU FAIL to attempt to do. It is my attempt to try to figure out where this project is heading.

You are right, I should not have to do it. YOU SHOULD DO IT. AND PRESENT IT. That way people won't be let down.

I like the initial vision Walter Bright put forth years ago, that is to make a better C++. That has somehow evolved into making a compiled C#. Can you please ASSESS that.

You and Walter Bright are leads.

I expect any project and you to put forth:

1. A clear vision that establish a firm boundary.
2. A small set of clear measurable goals that give the project direction. 3. A list of points stating what the project is not going to address in the immediate future.

This endless walk through what is wrong with D project management just isn't useful, because you don't want to listen.

Reply via email to