On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu<[email protected]> wrote: > Leandro Lucarella wrote: >> >> Leandro Lucarella, el 27 de julio a las 11:15 me escribiste: >>>> >>>> If dip5 is as bad as opGet_foo is I'll delete it right now. >>> >>> I think DIP5 should be removed, no matter how good or bad it is. If the >>> DIP has some consensus here, then somebody should add it to DIP4 as an >>> alternative. >> >> And BTW, *please* add an author to the proposal! > > It might be good to define a sort of an ombudsman for any given DIP. The > ombudsman would collect suggestions by email or NG and fold the relevant > ones in the DIP text.
I think it might also be good to have a two-tier system. "DIPs in training" can be made by anyone on the wiki. And then after some period of discussion, editing, and perhaps an informal community vote, *then* they can earn the official title of DIP and be moved to a different section of the wiki for DIPs that have significant community support. Or at least which are agreed to surpass some minimal editorial threshold. I think this could help prevent DIPs from turning into a Wiki form of the Eigenpoll. --bb
