On 12 February 2014 16:11, eles <e...@eles.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 12 February 2014 at 03:28:57 UTC, Manu wrote: > >> On 12 February 2014 12:11, Manu <turkey...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 12 February 2014 05:43, Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > >> I've changed my mind. Depending on a functional link-stripper sucks. >> I think it's definitely useful, although I think it should be implemented >> as a suite of flags, not just a single one. Sure, a convenience flag can >> be >> offered, but as an implementation detail, it should be a suite of flags. >> > > I like this and I also think providing compiler switches (ie. without > naming the subset) as being acceptable. > > However, what if I would need those switches for just one particular > module and the functions therein? How to compile only those modules with > the switches? > > Only through manual compile/linking? >
Yes, exactly as with C++ today. It shouldn't be an unfamiliar problem to most.
