On Thursday, 13 February 2014 at 20:00:29 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/13/2014 10:34 AM, francesco cattoglio wrote:
Also, the current open issues list is HUGE, cutting it down by
discarding outdated stuff would be nice. Or at least, would
*look* nice. Honestly, the first time I took a look at D I was
like "wait, is this a programming language or a testbed for
some
strange compiler?" :P
Restrict your search for open bugs to "D2" and "D1 & D2" and
you'll be fine.
I never thought to do that as I have just gone by the "Bug
Tracker" graphic on the website up until now. Interesting idea.
Here is a chart comparing how the number of open bugs changes
when those two filters are applied to the "Bug Tracker" queries.
Before After
Regression 9 9
Blocker 17 17
Critical 69 63
Major 221 206
Normal, minor, trivial 1923 1420
Enhancement 1153 866
All Open 3392 2586
That large of a difference surprised me. Seems like it would help
with the impression of quality to someone first coming to the
site by displaying the data filtered for D2 instead. It also
seems more accurate since the D1 only stuff is not really being
worked on and that page presents sort of a TODO list.
Joseph
