"Andrei Alexandrescu" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... >> >> Sure. My point is that with using standard method definition syntax >> there's no need for even looking over an example. >
So people are going to automagically just *know* to stick "opGet_" in front of the name to make it a property? > PLUS: > > * need to remember that get is not followed by () > 1. That's trivial to remember. 2. Ok, so we can stick a () after get. > * need to remember that set does not take a type like any other function, > just an identifier > set(auto v) Problem solved. Plus with both of the above, you're seem to be using arguments against a specific decicated property syntax as as arguments against dedicated property syntaxes in general. > * need to remember that there is no () after width Why in the world would there be? It's not a function.
