Walter Bright:
On 2/13/2014 4:42 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:If I'm not missing anything, these three changes would let us completely define (or not define) type info in the library without breaking anything we have now!It's a good idea worth exploring.
And at this stage of the D life it's acceptable to even have tiny breaking changes, if they give back significant good things. A purely library implementation of TypeInfo could bring some advantages.
Bye, bearophile
