On 18 February 2014 02:48, Dejan Lekic <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> [snip] >> > > And do you realise that every sentence in your post is matter your your > persona taste. It is extremely subjective, and you provide no proof that > majority of people who are interested in all this share your opinion, do > you? Do not get me wrong, I am not defending Andrei here (he can defend > himself better than me). It is just shocking sometimes what kind of > non-sense is posted here. > Yes, they're obviously opinions. I wouldn't use phrasing like that if I wasn't trying to demonstrate my strong opinion on the matter. I only raised some details that are annoying me, I didn't say I had any science to show it was a majority opinion. I'm not sure why that's necessary to make an opinion oriented post. A large part of the reason for posting in the first place is to find if/how many people also feel that way. That's the nature of opinions, I don't know what other peoples are until I talk about it. Let me dodge back few quotes of your post back at you to think about what I > said in the paragraph above: > 1) "built on a rubbish foundation" > 2) "less shit" (no comment here...!) > 3) "nobody knows how to format 'case' statements" (well, if you do not > know, there are people who do) > 4) "The ugliness of the syntax" (again your own taste) > > If you scan your own post(s), you will find many examples of what I am > saying. This attitude of yours won't get you far. > Well, I firmly stand by all those convictions. They also look worse out of context. I don't think switch is particularly good, and firmly believe C's switch statement was (is) a design catastrophe. I've believed that for 20 years. You're welcome to disagree, and tell me why you do. I might even change my opinion if someone can convince me it's awesome the way it is for some reason. I've spent 3 days basically writing switch statements. I haven't enjoyed it, and I feel the experience is a big missed opportunity.
