On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 12:28:22 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Do you mean:Chaining operations that can return null (or some other known-to-be-invalid state) is a code-smell.That's quite different to saying: Chaining operations using . is a code-smell. which is what deadalnix said.
Chaining . for non-nullables should be OK, I don't know what issue deadlnix sees here (or it is just a typo?)
