On 2014-03-06 16:06, bearophile wrote:
Timon Gehr:
No. static foreach does not introduce a new scope.
"TypeTuple"-foreach does. Deprecating this language feature is not
in scope of the 'static foreach' DIP. It's separate, and I'd even
argue for not doing it.
My most basic point in this ER is to require a "static" before
"foreach" when you loop on TypeTuples, because the current situation
is confusing for newbies and makes D code less explicit:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4085
Introducing a third type of foreach that is intermediate between the
semantucs of the regular foreach and the already present typetuple
foreach is ridiculous, will increase the language complexity and will
make D and even more confusing for newbies.
Bye, bearophile
+1
