On 7 March 2014 01:24, Walter Bright <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/6/2014 5:10 PM, Sean Kelly wrote: >> >> However, as much as I like that having the Posix headers strongly >> encourages the user to write portable code, I can see the idea >> doesn't have a lot of traction around here. I beleive Iain's >> proposal is to phase them out and do exactly what you suggest, > > > Thanks, Sean, I appreciate the graciousness of your reply. > > > >> only to make "whatever" "core.foo" rather than simply "core". >> Which works for me as well. > > I don't have any axe to grind about what the "whatever" expands to, I'm cool > with either.
I assume the C headers will remain strictly under core.stdc? So it might make sense to transition core.sys -> core.stdc.sys?
