On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 12:23 +0000, Atila Neves wrote: […] > I suspect you might have missed the point of my original blog > post. Yes, it shows D beating Erlang and Go, and that's something > I obviously like. But that wasn't the point I was trying to make. > My point was that just by writing it in Go doesn't mean magical > performance benefits because of its CSP, and that vibe.d's fibers > would do just fine in a direct competition. The data seem to > support that.
That doesn't mean a CSP and dataflow implementations for D (à la DataRush, GPars, Go, PythonCSP, PyCSP) shouldn't attempted. Sadly I think I do not have the time to drive such an endeavour, but I wish I could contribute to it if someone else could drive. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
