On 3/9/14, 6:34 AM, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Sunday, 9 March 2014 at 13:08:05 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
Also, `byCodeUnit` and `byCodePoint` would probably be better names
than `raw` and `decode`, to much the already existing `byGrapheme` in
std.uni.
There already is a std.uni.byCodePoint. It is a higher order range that
accepts ranges of graphemes and ranges of code points (such as strings).
noice
`byCodeUnit` is essentially std.string.representation.
Actually not because for reasons that are unclear to me people really
want the individual type to be char, not ubyte.
Andrei
